• home button animated and flashing
    • JOIN THE STRUGGLE FOR DE-LINKING 33 YEARS FOR 50% OF LAST DRAWN SALARY & PENSION UPDATION ALONG WITH EVERY REVISION OF SALARY FOR EMPLOYEES

    Sunday, 31 March 2019

    DE LINKING 33 YEARS FOR 50% PENSION CASE STATUS--WP(C) 4357/2019 FILED BY NEW INDIA ASSURANCE RETIRED PENSIONERS

    

    High Court of Kerala

    High Court of Kerala

    : WP(C)
    : 8004/2019: 12-02-2019

    : KLHC01-011280-2019

    Case Status





    Petitioner and Advocate

    1) M.B.CHANDRAN,

        Advocate- V.K.SATHYANATHAN SMT.T.B.DHANYA
    2) M.K. VIJAYAN,
           
    3) K.K.SUNNY,
           
    4) BALAKRISHNAN M,
           
    5) K.K.NARAYANANKUTTY
           
    6) IGNATIOUS SIMENTHY,
           
    7) C.P.BALAKRISHNAN ,
           
    8) A.P.GIRIJASHANKAR
           
    9) P.N. DEVIPRASAD,
           
    10) P.M.IQBAL,
           

    Respondent and Advocate

    1) UNION OF INDIA,

    2) THE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECOTR,
        Advocate -SRI.M.JACOB MURICKAN   
    3) THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER,
        Advocate -SRI.M.JACOB MURICKAN   

    Acts

    Under Act(s)Under Section(s)
    CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 226

    History of Case Hearing


    Cause List Type JudgeBusiness On DateHearing DatePurpose of hearing


    13-02-2019 ADMISSION
    Part Two HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA13-02-2019 ADMISSION
    Order not uploaded by concerned court

    Category Details

    Category 150.14 OP - SERVICE - CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING. ( 344 )
    Sub Category 35.101 SERVICE - FIXATION OF PENSION ( 987 )


    OBJECTION

    Sr.No.Scrutiny DateOBJECTIONCompliance DateReceipt Date
    112-02-2019All Objections are Complied----

    Wednesday, 20 March 2019

    WHY PENSION UPDATION REQUIRED

     It is an accepted fact there is erosion of money value.The salaried class are badly affected by this phenomenon.In order to contain   this loss to a certain extent  due to depletion of money value Dearness Allowance is introduced.In the long run Dearness Allowance also become insufficient to safe guard money value & purchasing power due to unforeseen economic conditions, Pay revision is resorted to make up loss of money value & purchasing power beyond the ambit of dearness allowance .Now coming to the subject of pension, Supreme court has already  declared that Pension is not a bounty, it is differed wages for the services reentered & a right. Although Dearness allowance is given in pension also to make up the erosion of money value & purchasing power, but discriminated from salaried successors by denying pension updation during wage revision, even though pension is a differed wage as declared by Hon Supreme Court.Hence this is case a which comes under Article 226.
    AN ARTICLE BY MBC MENON

    Monday, 11 March 2019

    ONE MORE PENSION OPTION SANCTIONED IN LIC/GIC


    RBI PENSION UPDATION SANCTIONED


    ATTENTION PRO RATA PENSIONERS OF LIC/GIC

    LIC/GIC Retirees from Kerala who want to file case for getting full pension de linking 33 years service may contact Adv. Sathyanathan Mob.9446208045.He is already Handling a group case for GIC & well versed with GIC/LIC Pension scheme & CCS Pension rules.There is no point in waiting for any favorable action from UOI & wasting time at the last leg of our life.

    Sunday, 7 October 2018

    Govt to create `talent pool', may allow second option on pension for PSU general insurance Cos

    New Delhi: The government is keen to  set up a `talent pool’ to deal with the succession planning for the PSU general insurance sector,even as, it has for the first time has shown favourable response to the long standing demand give one...
    Union finance minister Arun Jaitley

    New Delhi:
    The government is keen to  set up a `talent pool’ to deal with the succession planning for the PSU general insurance sector,even as, it has for the first time has shown favourable response to the long standing demand give one more option on pension to the older employees of the sector. 

    Addressing the two-day strategic conclave- termed as Manthan- at New Delhi on Saturday, , Rajeev Kumar, secretary, DFS, Ministry of Finance , said the government will create a talent pool of officials who will be eligible for the fast track  promotions to hold the top positions of the public sector general insurance companies.

    Addressing the conclave on the concluding day , Union finance minister Arun Jaitley, said the government is favourably disposed towards allowing  a second  option on pension for the employees, those who were working before 2004,  of the PSU general insurance sector.

    After 2004, all the government employees  are governed by a system launched through  New Pension Scheme(NPS).

    ``Providing one more option on pension to the employees, who had not opted for it, will not put any extra burden on the governmemnt,'' he said.

    Jaitley also assured that the post of the CMD at the New India India Assurance (NIA)will be filled up soon .

    ``The post of the CMD at United India Insurance hasn’t been filled as yet as the appointee- Girish Radhakrishnan, CEO, NIA’s London operation- is yet to get regulatory clearance to get relieved from his present assignment,’’ he said. 

    The government for the first time had allowed pension option to the employees of the PSU general insurance companies way back in 1995 and 1996 but a lot of employees , almost 20 per cent of 60,000 employees had not availed it.

    Since then, the demand for one more option for pension is pending with the government. 

    Meanwhile, the two-day conclave that conducted brain storming session on the six-point agenda,  Product & Risk Management, HR Practices, Talent, Distribution, Technology & Digital , Customer Experience  & Operation and Inclusive Growth,has identified 36 micro issues for which action plans will be developed.

    The six groups that were deliberating the six broad issues will be meeting in every two-three weeks to devise suitable action plans, said sources who had  attended  the two-day conclave. 

     Subhash C  Khuntia, chairman, IRDAI also addressed  the conclave.The MoF had roped in two consultants McKinsey and Boston Consulting Group(BCG).Vikas Agnihotri, director, Google India, had addressed the conclave on `The New Internet Users’.

    However, the scheduled address by Arundhati  Bhattacharya, former chairman of State Bank of India didn’t happen.

    Senior officials including CMDs and directors, general mangers, senior deputy general managers  of state-owned insurers, NIA , United India Insurance,  Oriental Insurance, National Insurance, Agriculture Insurance Company and GIC Re had attended the event. 

    Though the merger of three companies, UII, NIC and OIC have been announced,, the issue was not a part of the agenda at the convention.


    Saturday, 21 July 2018

    LIC CASES ARE POSTED FOR HEARING ON 24/07/2018 IN SUPREME COURT

    [AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES]
    14
    ALL INDIA INSURANCE PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS.
    M. RAMBABU AND CO.

    Versus



    UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2], [R-3]



     14.1
    Connected
    SLP(C) No. 20929/2017
    XIV
    ALL INDIA RETIRED INSURANCE EMPLOYEES FEDERATION
    RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

    Versus



    LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

    and
    IA No. 141188/2017 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

     14.2
    Connected
    SLP(C) No. 21206/2017
    XIV
    FEDERATION OF RETD. LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
    T. L. GARG

    Versus



    UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2], [R-3]

    FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

     14.3
    Connected
    SLP(C) No. 27963/2017
    XIV
    RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
    GYAN PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA

    Versus



    LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1]

    IA No.70987/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

     14.4
    Connected
    SLP(C) No. 30000/2017
    XIV
    KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA
    PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

    Versus



    LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ORS.
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1]

    IA No.91874/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IA No.95721/2017-I/A FOR DELETION OF PERFORMA RESPONDENTS

     14.5
    Connected
    SLP(C) No. 28873/2017
    XIV
    MADAN LAL GANDHI AND ORS.
    JAY SAVLA

    Versus



    UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPT. OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS AND ORS.
    ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

    Sunday, 8 July 2018

    OUR ONGOING LEGAL BATTLE IN SUPREME COURT


    DEAR ALL,
    IT IS ONE YEAR SINCE MSM LEFT US.
    It is exactly a year ago on 8/7/2017 that Mr M Sreenivasa Murty left us for his heavenly abode leaving not only his near and dear ones in his family in grief, but also about 50000 LIC Pensioners grieving when he was in the midst of handling the health issues of his better half (besides his own health issues to which he gave lesser attention) besides being intensively engaged to take a plunge in the final legal battle in the Supreme Court. He was more preoccupied with his mission to secure justice for the Pensioners in the last lap of the legal fight about to commence at the Supreme Court. He literally sacrificed his life and resources for the just cause of the pensioners. Just before his demise he was vigorously preparing to finalise the draft of the SLP of our Hyderabad Association to be filed in the Supreme Court, but destiny did not allow him to continue in his mission. His unfortunate demise dealt a severe blow to the fraternity of pensioners and created a traumatic vacuum in our Association's effort to carry on with the legal fight.   
    We had to gradually come to terms with the shocking development and MSM's soul guided us during the critical periods during the past one year of his absence and enabled us to go through the legal process in the midst of financial constraints faced by our Association to the extent possible with the blessings and cooperation of pensioners from across the length and breadth of the country. We are now on the path of the final management of the struggle from 24/7/2018 when our SLPs are scheduled to be taken up by the SC for admission and hearing.
    As far as the SLPs and rejoinders filed by the various petitioners are concerned, I believe that all the petitioners/Petitioner Associations would have highlighted and emphasized  the strong grounds in favour of the Pensioners. As far as the SLP and Rejoinder filed by our Hyderabad Retired Class I Officers' Association are concerned, we are confident that we have made them as comprehensive and sound as possible. We have especially tried to highlight the apparent glaring errors in the DHC judgment and also to effectively refute the unsustainable  points made in the counter affidavit filed by LIC.
    While on this, I may inform our pensioner friends, that, notwithstanding our contest of the verdict of the Delhi High Court through our SLP, we have made constant efforts to get LIC to comply with the direction of the said High Court to LIC to provide partial relief by way of payment of arrears of DR besides revising the DR as per modifications ordered in the judgment and also upgradation of minimum pension ordered by the Bench. But unfortunately, LIC has chosen not to comply with the Court order although they had not challenged the High Court Order dated 27/4/2017 during the past more than one year and there being no stay of the DHC judgment. I had even sent queries through an RTI application made to LIC CO to which I received only an evasive reply. I have made an appeal to the Appellate Authority (in LIC) on 21/6/2018.Going by my experience with the RTI response of LIC in a number of cases , I am not sure whether I shall get a positive response  from the Appellate Authority. If I do not receive a satisfactory reply to my Appeal, I propose to make a final appeal to Central Information Commission.
    Now, coming to the final battle in the Supreme Court on our SLP, no doubt our SLP and Rejoinder have enormous strength of grounds. But unless these strong grounds are argued before the SC bench by a senior counsel engaged by us, all our efforts cannot fructify easily. This is the area where we are constrained financially. With MSM handling the case, we had assured comfort both from the point of legal front and the financial front besides the cooperation rendered by the pensioners from all over the country. Now the situation has become different on the financial front. We are in dire need of funds for engaging a senior counsel and carrying on the legal fight ahead. It is now a 'Do or Die' situation we are in, to put it in short.
    I therefore appeal to all my pensioner friends to liberally contribute to our legal fund so that we will be in a position to carry the legal fight to a successful conclusion thereby benefiting the long-waiting pensioners through upgradation of pension. Individual contributions at the rate of  at least Rs 5000/- will be greatly useful for our purpose although we shall value contributions of lesser amounts  from pensioner friends with gratitude.
    Nothing can be a better tribute to the memory of MSM than achieving the desired successful outcome in our case in Supreme Court for the benefit of all generations of pensioners for which all of us need to contribute our mite.
    The particulars of our Association's Bank Account are mentioned below for your ready reference:
    PARTICULARS FOR FUND TRANSFER

    ACCOUNT NAME: RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, HYDERABAD
    SB A/c No 053310100000317
    Bank : ANDHRA BANK SAIFABAD BRANCH,HYDERABAD,
    IFSC  No ANDB0000533

    Cheques may be drawn in favour of "RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, HYDERABAD" and sent to Treasurer at the following address:

    Shri Y V Subba Rao,
    Block No 4, Flat No G1, Diamond Estates,
    Ram Murty Nagar,CBCID  Colony,
    Hyder Nagar,
    Hyderabad 500072
    Mob No 9491124614

    With greetings,

    C H Mahadevan